Grief in Care Work: Supporting Staff After Loss | The Daily Round
The UK’s fastest-growing news and insight platform for the care sector.

Looking for something specific? Try a search…

Leadership in Practice

Practical Tools for Everyday Leadership

Practical guidance, tools, and best practice to help care sector leaders manage people, develop staff, navigate compliance, and lead with confidence every day.

Can You Grieve Someone You Were Paid to Care For?

The news reached the manager before the morning handover. A man her homecare service had supported for nearly four years had died during the night, with his daughter beside him. His death had been expected, but the message still stopped her. She thought about his dry sense of humour, the precise way he liked his breakfast prepared and the complaints he made whenever a new carer arrived five minutes early.

Then the practical questions began. Which staff needed to be told? Had the relevant notifications been made? Were there visits to cancel, medicines to account for or records to complete? Who would contact the family, and what should be said? Within minutes, grief had become work.

Death is part of care, particularly in services supporting older people, people with life-limiting conditions and those approaching the end of life. That familiarity does not necessarily make it easier. A person may have received care several times a day for years. Staff may have known their routines, their history, their family and the small details that rarely appear in a care plan. When that person dies, the relationship does not become emotionally insignificant because it was professional.

Care managers occupy a particularly difficult position. They may have known the person well, but their first responsibility is often to everybody else. They need to support staff, communicate sensitively with the family and ensure the practical aftermath is handled properly. Their own reaction is pushed further down the list.

The manager in our scenario called the care workers who had supported the man most frequently before the news could reach them indirectly. One cried immediately. Another became quiet and asked whether she had missed something during her final visit. A third said she was fine and volunteered to take an extra call that afternoon.

Each response required something different. The manager listened, reassured staff that the death had been expected and reminded them that questions could be discussed in supervision. She also considered whether anybody was too distressed to continue working safely. Care does not stop because a team is grieving, and the next person on the rota still needs calm, attentive support.

This can place staff in an emotionally demanding position. They may leave the home of somebody who has just died and travel directly to another person who wants to talk, laugh or complain that their tea is cold. Professionalism requires the worker to be present for that next person, but it should not require them to behave as though nothing has happened.

Managers need to make room for different forms of grief. Some staff will want to talk about the person. Others will focus on tasks or avoid the conversation altogether. A worker who appears unaffected may be processing the death privately, while someone who had fewer visits with the person may be surprised by the strength of their reaction. Previous bereavements can also return unexpectedly, making the response about more than one loss.

There may be guilt alongside sadness. Care workers often replay their last interaction and wonder whether they should have noticed a change, stayed longer or said something different. Where a death was sudden or its circumstances are unclear, those questions may become more intense. Managers should not offer certainty before the facts are known, but neither should they allow staff to carry unsupported blame while appropriate reviews take place.

The family, meanwhile, may still see the service as part of the person’s final story. A thoughtful call can matter enormously. It allows the manager to offer condolences, acknowledge the relationship and establish whether there are immediate practical matters requiring attention. The conversation should not become an administrative checklist delivered into the first hours of bereavement.

Families can respond in unpredictable ways. Some want to thank individual carers and share memories. Others need distance. A family may be grieving and angry at the same time, particularly if they have questions about the care provided. Expressions of sympathy must therefore sit alongside openness about any concerns, incidents or necessary investigations. Compassion does not remove accountability, and an investigation does not make compassion inappropriate.

After a death, the service still has work to complete. Records may need to be finalised and securely retained. Visits must be removed from the rota. Equipment, keys, medicines or personal belongings may need to be dealt with in accordance with the service’s procedures and the circumstances of the care. Relevant professionals and organisations may need to be informed, while any required notifications, reviews or safeguarding action must be considered.

In a care home, the empty room can become an immediate reminder that the person has gone. Staff may need to prepare it while memories of its occupant are still vivid. Other residents may ask questions, experience their own grief or become anxious about what the death means for them. Managers must balance honesty and sensitivity with the person’s confidentiality and the family’s wishes.

In homecare, the loss can feel less visible. The person simply disappears from the rota, leaving a gap between two other calls. A carer who visited them every morning may suddenly have no formal reason to speak their name again. This can make homecare grief particularly private, despite the closeness of the relationship.

Small acts of remembrance can help when they are appropriate and agreed. A condolence card from the team, a message shared with the family or a few minutes in a staff meeting to remember the person can acknowledge that the relationship mattered. Attendance at a funeral may be comforting for some families and staff, but services need a consistent and sensitive approach that considers professional boundaries, staffing and the family’s preferences.

The person receiving care should never become a story that staff feel entitled to share publicly. Grief does not remove confidentiality. Photographs, details of the death or tributes on personal social-media accounts can create difficulties even when the intention is affectionate. Managers may need to remind staff gently that respect continues after death.

Once everyone else has been contacted and the immediate actions are complete, the manager may finally notice their own feelings. It might happen while closing the person’s electronic record, seeing their name disappear from a report or hearing a member of staff repeat one of their familiar jokes. The manager may feel sadness, relief that suffering has ended, guilt about that relief or nothing at all until days later.

Managers sometimes question whether they have a right to grieve. They were paid to oversee the person’s care. They were not a relative or lifelong friend. The family’s loss is undoubtedly different and should never be displaced by the service’s feelings, but grief is not allocated according to job title. A professional relationship can still be meaningful.

The risk is that managers become so accustomed to holding other people’s emotions that they stop recognising their own. One death follows another, each accompanied by records, calls and decisions. Without time to reflect, the emotional weight can accumulate and emerge as irritability, numbness, disrupted sleep or a growing sense of distance from the work.

Good providers should make space for managers as well as frontline staff. Supervision after a death should not focus only on whether procedures were followed. It should ask what the experience has left behind, whether the manager is repeatedly replaying events and whether further support is needed. Where a death has been traumatic, unexpected or connected to a serious incident, more structured professional help may be appropriate.

Grieving somebody you were paid to care for does not mean professional boundaries have failed. It can mean that, within those boundaries, a genuine human relationship existed.

The manager in our scenario eventually called the man’s daughter. They spoke briefly about his final hours, but before the conversation ended, his daughter laughed and said: “He really did hate it when people arrived early.”

For a moment, he was not a closed care package or a notification to complete. He was himself again: particular, funny and remembered. The manager returned to the day’s work, but she allowed herself to feel the loss before she did.

Keep looking after you

Wellbeing looks different for everyone, and sometimes the most useful thing is simply finding the right information at the right time. Explore more from Daily Round with our dedicated Women’s Health, Men’s Wellbeing and Wellbeing for Leaders sections, or head to the Leaders Library for our latest book recommendations, ideas and inspiration for life in and outside work.

Or, if you’re ready to get back to what’s happening across the sector, catch up with today’s Daily News for the latest health and social care stories.

Posted by:
K Jadon
Editorial Assistant – The Daily Round

Everything You Need. In Bite-Sized Updates

Busy day? We’ve got you covered. Get FREE daily news, practical insights, opportunities and wellbeing content, carefully curated for busy health and social care professionals. Just enter your details below to get The Daily Briefing delivered straight to your inbox.

Your Information
Your Interests
By subscribing, you agree to receive emails from The Daily Round, including news, updates and other relevant communications. Your information will be processed in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. You can unsubscribe at any time.